Skip to main content

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

At-risk Adults without a Routine Doctor Visit in Past Two Years

Select a Hospital Referral Region
Measurement Period: 2013-2014

Percent of adults age 50 or older, or in fair or poor health, or ever told they have diabetes or pre-diabetes, acute myocardial infarction, heart disease, stroke, or asthma who did not visit a doctor for a routine checkup in the past two years. Authors’ analysis of 2011–2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (NCCDPHP, BRFSS 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014).

Why is this important?

At-risk adults require routine medical care to monitor their condition. At-risk adults who do not visit a doctor regularly may experience adverse health effects. 
More...
Select a comparison
Loading...

At-risk Adults without a Routine Doctor Visit in Past Two Years

:
Comparison:
Measurement Period: 2013-2014
Data Source: Commonwealth Fund
May 10, 2024dashboard.mihia.org
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
12.0%
13.0%
Percentage of adults
Sort by Trend Sort by Change from Prior Value
Hospital Referral Region Source Period Percentage of adults

Data Source

Filed under: Health / Health Care Access & Quality, Economy, Clinical Care, Adults, Older Adults

Michigan Health Improvement Alliance