Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Demographics Dashboard

The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.  

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Michigan

Population

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Population

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Total Population

Current Value:

State: Michigan Total Population

10,037,261
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (10,037,261) is greater  than the previously measured value (10,033,281).
Prior Value
(10,033,281)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

State: Michigan Population Under Age 5

5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Michigan has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (5.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

State: Michigan Population Under Age 18

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Michigan has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (21.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

State: Michigan Population Over Age 65

18.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Michigan has a value of 18.7%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (18.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (18.3%).
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Female Population

Current Value:

State: Michigan Female Population

50.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Michigan has a value of 50.3%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (50.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.3%).
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Male Population

Current Value:

State: Michigan Male Population

49.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Michigan has a value of 49.7%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (49.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.7%).
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Population White

Current Value:

State: Michigan Population White

78.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Michigan has a value of 78.8%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (78.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (78.9%).
Prior Value
(78.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Black or African American

Current Value:
14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Michigan has a value of 14.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (14.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (14.2%).
Prior Value
(14.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Michigan has a value of 0.7%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (0.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.7%).
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Asian

Current Value:

State: Michigan Population Asian

3.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Michigan has a value of 3.5%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (3.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Michigan has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
2.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Michigan has a value of 2.8%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (2.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
5.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Michigan has a value of 5.7%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (5.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
74.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Michigan has a value of 74.0%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (74.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (74.2%).
Prior Value
(74.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Veteran Population

Current Value:

State: Michigan Veteran Population

6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Michigan has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Michigan Foreign Born Persons

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Michigan has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Housing

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Housing

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Housing Units

Current Value:

State: Michigan Housing Units

4,611,660
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (4,611,660) is greater  than the previously measured value (4,592,216).
Prior Value
(4,592,216)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Homeownership

Current Value:

State: Michigan Homeownership

63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Michigan has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

State: Michigan Median Housing Unit Value

$201,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Michigan has a value of $201,100 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$1,472
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Michigan has a value of $1,472 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$565
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($584), Michigan has a value of $565 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

State: Michigan Median Household Gross Rent

$1,037
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Michigan has a value of $1,037 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Households

Current Value:

State: Michigan Households

4,009,253
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Average Household Size

Current Value:

State: Michigan Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Michigan has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Education

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Education

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
91.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 91.8% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Michigan has a value of 91.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
31.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Michigan has a value of 31.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Michigan Persons with a Disability

14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Michigan has a value of 14.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 94.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (94.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.6%).
Prior Value
(93.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

State: Michigan

Economy

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Economy

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 57.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Michigan has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 57.1% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Michigan has a value of 57.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Total Employment

Current Value:

State: Michigan Total Employment

3,768,321
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (3,768,321) is less  than the previously measured value (4,000,120).
Prior Value
(4,000,120)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Total Employment Change

Current Value:

State: Michigan Total Employment Change

-5.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of -5.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than -3.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Michigan has a value of -5.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (-5.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.5%).
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

State: Michigan Mean Travel Time to Work

24.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 24.5 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Michigan has a value of 24.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Median Household Income

Current Value:

State: Michigan Median Household Income

$68,505
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of $68,505 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than $72,458 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than $66,341.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Michigan has a value of $68,505 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan Per Capita Income

Current Value:

State: Michigan Per Capita Income

$37,929
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of $37,929 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than $38,585 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than $36,754.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Michigan has a value of $37,929 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Michigan People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Michigan has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

State: Michigan

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

State: Michigan Employer Establishments

Current Value:

State: Michigan Employer Establishments

221,060
Number of Establishments
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Michigan (221,060) is less  than the previously measured value (222,226).
Prior Value
(222,226)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Michigan Health Improvement Alliance