Home > Community Dashboard > Custom Dashboard

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Arenac Census Tracts
  • County : Arenac Zip Codes
  • County : Bay Census Tracts
  • County : Bay Zip Codes
  • County : Clare Census Tracts
  • County : Clare Zip Codes
  • County : Gladwin Census Tracts
  • County : Gladwin Zip Codes
  • County : Gratiot Census Tracts
  • County : Gratiot Zip Codes
  • County : Huron Census Tracts
  • County : Huron Zip Codes
  • County : Iosco Census Tracts
  • County : Iosco Zip Codes
  • County : Isabella Census Tracts
  • County : Isabella Zip Codes
  • County : Midland Census Tracts
  • County : Midland Zip Codes
  • County : Ogemaw Census Tracts
  • County : Ogemaw Zip Codes
  • County : Roscommon Census Tracts
  • County : Roscommon Zip Codes
  • County : Saginaw Census Tracts
  • County : Saginaw Zip Codes
  • County : Sanilac Census Tracts
  • County : Sanilac Zip Codes
  • County : Tuscola Census Tracts
  • County : Tuscola Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Additional Search Options
Clear all search filters

Search Results:

Save a link to this search
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Arenac

Current Value:

County: Arenac

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Arenac has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Arenac has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Arenac (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Over time, the Arenac value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Bay

Current Value:

County: Bay

10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Bay has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bay has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Bay (10.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.2%).
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Over time, the Bay value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Clare

Current Value:

County: Clare

8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Clare has a value of 8.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clare has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Clare (8.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Over time, the Clare value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Gladwin

Current Value:

County: Gladwin

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gladwin has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gladwin has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Gladwin (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Over time, the Gladwin value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Gratiot

Current Value:

County: Gratiot

7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gratiot has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gratiot has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Gratiot (7.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Over time, the Gratiot value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Huron

Current Value:

County: Huron

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Huron has a value of 8.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Huron has a value of 8.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Huron (8.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Over time, the Huron value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Iosco

Current Value:

County: Iosco

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Iosco has a value of 9.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Iosco has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Iosco (9.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Over time, the Iosco value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Isabella

Current Value:

County: Isabella

8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Isabella has a value of 8.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Isabella has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Isabella (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Over time, the Isabella value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Midland

Current Value:

County: Midland

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Midland has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Midland has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Midland (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Over time, the Midland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Ogemaw

Current Value:

County: Ogemaw

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Ogemaw (7.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Over time, the Ogemaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Roscommon

Current Value:

County: Roscommon

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Roscommon has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Roscommon has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Roscommon (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Over time, the Roscommon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Saginaw

Current Value:

County: Saginaw

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Saginaw has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saginaw has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Saginaw (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Over time, the Saginaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Sanilac

Current Value:

County: Sanilac

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Sanilac has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sanilac has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Sanilac (7.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Over time, the Sanilac value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Tuscola

Current Value:

County: Tuscola

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Tuscola has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tuscola has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Tuscola (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Over time, the Tuscola value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes Region: MiHIA

Current Value:

Region: MiHIA

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), MiHIA has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Akron

Current Value:

Census Place: Akron

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Akron has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Akron has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Akron has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Alma

Current Value:

Census Place: Alma

10.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Alma has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Alma has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Alma has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Applegate

Current Value:

Census Place: Applegate

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Applegate has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Applegate has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Applegate has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Ashley

Current Value:

Census Place: Ashley

13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Ashley has a value of 13.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ashley has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Ashley has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Au Gres

Current Value:

Census Place: Au Gres

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Au Gres has a value of 14.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Au Gres has a value of 14.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Au Gres has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Au Sable

Current Value:

Census Place: Au Sable

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Au Sable has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Au Sable has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Au Sable has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Auburn

Current Value:

Census Place: Auburn

9.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Auburn has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Auburn has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Auburn has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Bad Axe

Current Value:

Census Place: Bad Axe

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Bad Axe has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bad Axe has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bad Axe has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Bay City

Current Value:

Census Place: Bay City

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Bay City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bay City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bay City has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Bay Port

Current Value:

Census Place: Bay Port

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Bay Port has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bay Port has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bay Port has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Beal City

Current Value:

Census Place: Beal City

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Beal City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Beal City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Beal City has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Beaverton

Current Value:

Census Place: Beaverton

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Beaverton has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Beaverton has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Beaverton has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Birch Run

Current Value:

Census Place: Birch Run

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Birch Run has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Birch Run has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Birch Run has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Breckenridge

Current Value:

Census Place: Breckenridge

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Breckenridge has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Breckenridge has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Breckenridge has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Bridgeport

Current Value:

Census Place: Bridgeport

17.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Bridgeport has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bridgeport has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bridgeport has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Brown City

Current Value:

Census Place: Brown City

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Brown City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brown City has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Brown City has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Buena Vista

Current Value:

Census Place: Buena Vista

21.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 21.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Buena Vista has a value of 21.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Buena Vista has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Burt

Current Value:

Census Place: Burt

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Burt has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Burt has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Burt has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Caro

Current Value:

Census Place: Caro

13.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Caro has a value of 13.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caro has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Caro has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Carsonville

Current Value:

Census Place: Carsonville

10.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Carsonville has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Carsonville has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Carsonville has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Caseville

Current Value:

Census Place: Caseville

14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Caseville has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caseville has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Caseville has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Cass City

Current Value:

Census Place: Cass City

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Cass City has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cass City has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Cass City has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Chesaning

Current Value:

Census Place: Chesaning

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Chesaning has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Chesaning has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Chesaning has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Clare

Current Value:

Census Place: Clare

13.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Clare has a value of 13.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clare has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Clare has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Coleman

Current Value:

Census Place: Coleman

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Coleman has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Coleman has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Coleman has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Croswell

Current Value:

Census Place: Croswell

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Croswell has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Croswell has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Croswell has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Deckerville

Current Value:

Census Place: Deckerville

12.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Deckerville has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Deckerville has a value of 12.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Deckerville has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: East Tawas

Current Value:

Census Place: East Tawas

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, East Tawas has a value of 14.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, East Tawas has a value of 14.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), East Tawas has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Elkton

Current Value:

Census Place: Elkton

10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Elkton has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Elkton has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Elkton has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Essexville

Current Value:

Census Place: Essexville

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Essexville has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Essexville has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Essexville has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Fairgrove

Current Value:

Census Place: Fairgrove

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Fairgrove has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fairgrove has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Fairgrove has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Farwell

Current Value:

Census Place: Farwell

12.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Farwell has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Farwell has a value of 12.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Farwell has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Forestville

Current Value:

Census Place: Forestville

15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Forestville has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Forestville has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Forestville has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Fostoria

Current Value:

Census Place: Fostoria

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Fostoria has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fostoria has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Fostoria has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Frankenmuth

Current Value:

Census Place: Frankenmuth

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Frankenmuth has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Frankenmuth has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Frankenmuth has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Freeland

Current Value:

Census Place: Freeland

9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Freeland has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Freeland has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Freeland has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Gagetown

Current Value:

Census Place: Gagetown

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Gagetown has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Gagetown has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Gagetown has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Gladwin

Current Value:

Census Place: Gladwin

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Gladwin has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Gladwin has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Gladwin has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Harbor Beach

Current Value:

Census Place: Harbor Beach

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Harbor Beach has a value of 13.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Harbor Beach has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Harbor Beach has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Harrison

Current Value:

Census Place: Harrison

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Harrison has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Harrison has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Harrison has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Hemlock

Current Value:

Census Place: Hemlock

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Hemlock has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hemlock has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Hemlock has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Houghton Lake

Current Value:

Census Place: Houghton Lake

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Houghton Lake has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Houghton Lake has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Houghton Lake has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Ithaca

Current Value:

Census Place: Ithaca

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Ithaca has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ithaca has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Ithaca has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Kinde

Current Value:

Census Place: Kinde

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Kinde has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kinde has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kinde has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Kingston

Current Value:

Census Place: Kingston

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Kingston has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kingston has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kingston has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Lake Isabella

Current Value:

Census Place: Lake Isabella

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Lake Isabella has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Isabella has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Lake Isabella has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Lexington

Current Value:

Census Place: Lexington

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Lexington has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lexington has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Lexington has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Loomis

Current Value:

Census Place: Loomis

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Loomis has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Loomis has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Loomis has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Lupton

Current Value:

Census Place: Lupton

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Lupton has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lupton has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Lupton has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Marlette

Current Value:

Census Place: Marlette

12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Marlette has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Marlette has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Marlette has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Mayville

Current Value:

Census Place: Mayville

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Mayville has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mayville has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mayville has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Melvin

Current Value:

Census Place: Melvin

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Melvin has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Melvin has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Melvin has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Merrill

Current Value:

Census Place: Merrill

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Merrill has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Merrill has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Merrill has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Midland

Current Value:

Census Place: Midland

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Midland has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Midland has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Midland has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Millington

Current Value:

Census Place: Millington

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Millington has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Millington has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Millington has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Minden City

Current Value:

Census Place: Minden City

10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Minden City has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Minden City has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Minden City has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Mount Pleasant

Current Value:

Census Place: Mount Pleasant

7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Mount Pleasant has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mount Pleasant has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mount Pleasant has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Oakley

Current Value:

Census Place: Oakley

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Oakley has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oakley has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Oakley has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Omer

Current Value:

Census Place: Omer

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Omer has a value of 13.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Omer has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Omer has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Oscoda

Current Value:

Census Place: Oscoda

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Oscoda has a value of 16.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oscoda has a value of 16.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Oscoda has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Owendale

Current Value:

Census Place: Owendale

10.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Owendale has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Owendale has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Owendale has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Peck

Current Value:

Census Place: Peck

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Peck has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Peck has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Peck has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Perrinton

Current Value:

Census Place: Perrinton

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Perrinton has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Perrinton has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Perrinton has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Pigeon

Current Value:

Census Place: Pigeon

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Pigeon has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pigeon has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Pigeon has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Pinconning

Current Value:

Census Place: Pinconning

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Pinconning has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Pinconning has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Pinconning has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Port Austin

Current Value:

Census Place: Port Austin

15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Port Austin has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Austin has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Port Austin has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Port Hope

Current Value:

Census Place: Port Hope

13.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Port Hope has a value of 13.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hope has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Port Hope has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Port Sanilac

Current Value:

Census Place: Port Sanilac

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Port Sanilac has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Sanilac has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Port Sanilac has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prescott

Current Value:

Census Place: Prescott

16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Prescott has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prescott has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Prescott has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prudenville

Current Value:

Census Place: Prudenville

14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Prudenville has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prudenville has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Prudenville has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Reese

Current Value:

Census Place: Reese

12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Reese has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reese has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Reese has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Robin Glen-Indiantown

Current Value:

Census Place: Robin Glen-Indiantown

9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Robin Glen-Indiantown has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Robin Glen-Indiantown has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Robin Glen-Indiantown has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Roscommon

Current Value:

Census Place: Roscommon

10.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Roscommon has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Roscommon has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Roscommon has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Rose City

Current Value:

Census Place: Rose City

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Rose City has a value of 14.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Rose City has a value of 14.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rose City has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Rosebush

Current Value:

Census Place: Rosebush

12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Rosebush has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Rosebush has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rosebush has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Saginaw

Current Value:

Census Place: Saginaw

17.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Saginaw has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saginaw has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Saginaw has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Sand Lake

Current Value:

Census Place: Sand Lake

15.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Sand Lake has a value of 15.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sand Lake has a value of 15.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sand Lake has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Sandusky

Current Value:

Census Place: Sandusky

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Sandusky has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sandusky has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sandusky has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Sanford

Current Value:

Census Place: Sanford

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Sanford has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sanford has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sanford has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Sebewaing

Current Value:

Census Place: Sebewaing

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Sebewaing has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sebewaing has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sebewaing has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Shepherd

Current Value:

Census Place: Shepherd

10.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Shepherd has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Shepherd has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Shepherd has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Shields

Current Value:

Census Place: Shields

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Shields has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Shields has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Shields has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Skidway Lake

Current Value:

Census Place: Skidway Lake

16.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Skidway Lake has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Skidway Lake has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Skidway Lake has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Snover

Current Value:

Census Place: Snover

16.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Snover has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Snover has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Snover has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: St. Charles

Current Value:

Census Place: St. Charles

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, St. Charles has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, St. Charles has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), St. Charles has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: St. Helen

Current Value:

Census Place: St. Helen

17.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, St. Helen has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, St. Helen has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), St. Helen has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: St. Louis

Current Value:

Census Place: St. Louis

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, St. Louis has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, St. Louis has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), St. Louis has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Standish

Current Value:

Census Place: Standish

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Standish has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Standish has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Standish has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Sterling

Current Value:

Census Place: Sterling

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Sterling has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sterling has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sterling has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Tawas City

Current Value:

Census Place: Tawas City

14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Tawas City has a value of 14.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Tawas City has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Tawas City has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Turner

Current Value:

Census Place: Turner

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Turner has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Turner has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Turner has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Twining

Current Value:

Census Place: Twining

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Twining has a value of 12.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Twining has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Twining has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Ubly

Current Value:

Census Place: Ubly

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Ubly has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ubly has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Ubly has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Unionville

Current Value:

Census Place: Unionville

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Unionville has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Unionville has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Unionville has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Vassar

Current Value:

Census Place: Vassar

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Vassar has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Vassar has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Vassar has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Weidman

Current Value:

Census Place: Weidman

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Weidman has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Weidman has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Weidman has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: West Branch

Current Value:

Census Place: West Branch

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, West Branch has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, West Branch has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), West Branch has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Whittemore

Current Value:

Census Place: Whittemore

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Whittemore has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Whittemore has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Whittemore has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Zilwaukee

Current Value:

Census Place: Zilwaukee

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Census Places, Zilwaukee has a value of 13.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
MI Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Zilwaukee has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Zilwaukee has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48401

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48401

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48401 has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48401 has a value of 14.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48401 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48410

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48410

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48410 has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48410 has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48410 has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48413

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48413

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48413 has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48413 has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48413 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48415

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48415

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48415 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48415 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48415 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48416

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48416

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48416 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48416 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48416 has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48417

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48417

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48417 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48417 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48417 has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48419

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48419

12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48419 has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48419 has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48419 has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48422

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48422

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48422 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48422 has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48422 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48426

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48426

13.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48426 has a value of 13.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48426 has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48426 has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48427

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48427

13.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48427 has a value of 13.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48427 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48427 has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48432

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48432

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48432 has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48432 has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48432 has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48434

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48434

15.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48434 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48434 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48434 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48435

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48435

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48435 has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48435 has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48435 has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48441

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48441

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48441 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48441 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48441 has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48445

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48445

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48445 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48445 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48445 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48450

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48450

14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48450 has a value of 14.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48450 has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48450 has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48453

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48453

12.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48453 has a value of 12.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48453 has a value of 12.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48453 has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48454

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48454

13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48454 has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48454 has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48454 has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48456

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48456

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48456 has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48456 has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48456 has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48465

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48465

13.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48465 has a value of 13.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48465 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48465 has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48466

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48466

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48466 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48466 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48466 has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48467

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48467

15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48467 has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48467 has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48467 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48468

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48468

14.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48468 has a value of 14.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48468 has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48468 has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48469

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48469

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48469 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48469 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48469 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48470

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48470

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48470 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48470 has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48470 has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48471

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48471

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48471 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48471 has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48471 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48472

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48472

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48472 has a value of 13.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48472 has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48472 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48475

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48475

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48475 has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48475 has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48475 has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48601

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48601

19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48601 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48601 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48601 has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48602

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48602

14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48602 has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48602 has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48602 has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48603

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48603

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48603 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48603 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48603 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48604

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48604

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48604 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48604 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48604 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48607

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48607

18.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48607 has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48607 has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48607 has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48609

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48609

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48609 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48609 has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48609 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48610

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48610

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48610 has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48610 has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48610 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 48611

Current Value:

Zip Code: 48611

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Zip Codes, 48611 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
MI Zip Codes
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 48611 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 48611 has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
Learn More
Save Card
Michigan Health Improvement Alliance