Home > Community Dashboard > Custom Dashboard

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Arenac Census Tracts
  • County : Arenac Zip Codes
  • County : Bay Census Tracts
  • County : Bay Zip Codes
  • County : Clare Census Tracts
  • County : Clare Zip Codes
  • County : Gladwin Census Tracts
  • County : Gladwin Zip Codes
  • County : Gratiot Census Tracts
  • County : Gratiot Zip Codes
  • County : Huron Census Tracts
  • County : Huron Zip Codes
  • County : Iosco Census Tracts
  • County : Iosco Zip Codes
  • County : Isabella Census Tracts
  • County : Isabella Zip Codes
  • County : Midland Census Tracts
  • County : Midland Zip Codes
  • County : Ogemaw Census Tracts
  • County : Ogemaw Zip Codes
  • County : Roscommon Census Tracts
  • County : Roscommon Zip Codes
  • County : Saginaw Census Tracts
  • County : Saginaw Zip Codes
  • County : Sanilac Census Tracts
  • County : Sanilac Zip Codes
  • County : Tuscola Census Tracts
  • County : Tuscola Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Additional Search Options
Clear all search filters

Search Results:

Save a link to this search
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Clare

Current Value:

County: Clare

33.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Clare has a value of 33.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clare has a value of 33.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Clare has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Clare has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Clare value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Saginaw

Current Value:

County: Saginaw

27.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Saginaw has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saginaw has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Saginaw has a value of 27.3% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Saginaw has a value of 27.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Saginaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Roscommon

Current Value:

County: Roscommon

27.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Roscommon has a value of 27.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Roscommon has a value of 27.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Roscommon has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Roscommon has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Roscommon value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Ogemaw

Current Value:

County: Ogemaw

25.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Ogemaw has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Ogemaw has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Ogemaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Sanilac

Current Value:

County: Sanilac

23.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Sanilac has a value of 23.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sanilac has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Sanilac has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sanilac has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Sanilac value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Bay

Current Value:

County: Bay

22.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Bay has a value of 22.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bay has a value of 22.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Bay has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Bay has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Bay value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level Region: MiHIA

Current Value:

Region: MiHIA

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Gratiot

Current Value:

County: Gratiot

21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gratiot has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gratiot has a value of 21.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Gratiot has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Gratiot has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Gratiot value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Iosco

Current Value:

County: Iosco

20.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Iosco has a value of 20.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Iosco has a value of 20.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Iosco has a value of 20.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Iosco has a value of 20.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Iosco value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Isabella

Current Value:

County: Isabella

20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Isabella has a value of 20.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Isabella has a value of 20.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Isabella has a value of 20.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Isabella has a value of 20.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Isabella value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Gladwin

Current Value:

County: Gladwin

18.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gladwin has a value of 18.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gladwin has a value of 18.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Gladwin has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Gladwin has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Gladwin value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level State: Michigan

Current Value:

State: Michigan

17.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 17.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Michigan has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Arenac

Current Value:

County: Arenac

16.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Arenac has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Arenac has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Arenac has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Arenac has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Arenac value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Huron

Current Value:

County: Huron

15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Huron has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Huron has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Huron has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Huron has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Huron value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Tuscola

Current Value:

County: Tuscola

14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Tuscola has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tuscola has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Tuscola has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Tuscola has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Tuscola value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Midland

Current Value:

County: Midland

12.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Midland has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Midland has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Midland has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Midland has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
Over time, the Midland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Clare

Current Value:

County: Clare

13.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Clare has a value of 13.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clare has a value of 13.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Clare has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Clare has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Clare value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Iosco

Current Value:

County: Iosco

12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Iosco has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Iosco has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Iosco has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Iosco has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Iosco value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Tuscola

Current Value:

County: Tuscola

10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Tuscola has a value of 10.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tuscola has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Tuscola has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Tuscola has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Tuscola value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Bay

Current Value:

County: Bay

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Bay has a value of 10.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bay has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Bay has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Bay has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Bay value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Isabella

Current Value:

County: Isabella

9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Isabella has a value of 9.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Isabella has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Isabella has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Isabella has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Isabella value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Ogemaw

Current Value:

County: Ogemaw

9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 9.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Ogemaw has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Ogemaw has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Ogemaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Region: MiHIA

Current Value:

Region: MiHIA

9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the MiHIA value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Saginaw

Current Value:

County: Saginaw

9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Saginaw has a value of 9.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saginaw has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Saginaw has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Saginaw has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Saginaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Sanilac

Current Value:

County: Sanilac

9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Sanilac has a value of 9.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sanilac has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Sanilac has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Sanilac has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Sanilac value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Gladwin

Current Value:

County: Gladwin

9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gladwin has a value of 9.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gladwin has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Gladwin has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Gladwin has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Gladwin value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level State: Michigan

Current Value:

State: Michigan

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Michigan has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Huron

Current Value:

County: Huron

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Huron has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Huron has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Huron has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Huron has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Huron value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Roscommon

Current Value:

County: Roscommon

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Roscommon has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Roscommon has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Roscommon has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Roscommon has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Roscommon value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Gratiot

Current Value:

County: Gratiot

7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gratiot has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gratiot has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Gratiot has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Gratiot has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Gratiot value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Midland

Current Value:

County: Midland

7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Midland has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Midland has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Midland has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Midland has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Midland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Arenac

Current Value:

County: Arenac

7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Arenac has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Arenac has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Arenac has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Arenac has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
Over time, the Arenac value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) State: Michigan

Current Value:

State: Michigan

156,622
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Michigan value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Saginaw

Current Value:

County: Saginaw

3,450
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Saginaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Bay

Current Value:

County: Bay

2,136
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Bay value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Midland

Current Value:

County: Midland

1,254
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Midland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Tuscola

Current Value:

County: Tuscola

1,182
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Tuscola value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Clare

Current Value:

County: Clare

982
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clare value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Iosco

Current Value:

County: Iosco

894
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Iosco value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Sanilac

Current Value:

County: Sanilac

847
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sanilac value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Isabella

Current Value:

County: Isabella

832
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Isabella value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Huron

Current Value:

County: Huron

708
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Huron value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Roscommon

Current Value:

County: Roscommon

664
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Roscommon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Gladwin

Current Value:

County: Gladwin

618
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Gladwin value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Ogemaw

Current Value:

County: Ogemaw

529
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Ogemaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Gratiot

Current Value:

County: Gratiot

527
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Gratiot value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Arenac

Current Value:

County: Arenac

290
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Arenac value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Isabella

Current Value:

County: Isabella

23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Isabella has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Isabella has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Isabella has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Isabella has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Isabella value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Clare

Current Value:

County: Clare

22.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Clare has a value of 22.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clare has a value of 22.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Clare has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Clare has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Clare value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Saginaw

Current Value:

County: Saginaw

18.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Saginaw has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Saginaw has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Saginaw has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Saginaw has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Saginaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Ogemaw

Current Value:

County: Ogemaw

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ogemaw has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Ogemaw has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Ogemaw has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Ogemaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Roscommon

Current Value:

County: Roscommon

16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Roscommon has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Roscommon has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Roscommon has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Roscommon has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Roscommon value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level Region: MiHIA

Current Value:

Region: MiHIA

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Bay

Current Value:

County: Bay

15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Bay has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Bay has a value of 15.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Bay has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Bay has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Bay value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Iosco

Current Value:

County: Iosco

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Iosco has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Iosco has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Iosco has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Iosco has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Iosco value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Sanilac

Current Value:

County: Sanilac

15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Sanilac has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sanilac has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Sanilac has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sanilac has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Sanilac value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Gladwin

Current Value:

County: Gladwin

14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gladwin has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gladwin has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Gladwin has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Gladwin has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Gladwin value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Gratiot

Current Value:

County: Gratiot

14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Gratiot has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Gratiot has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Gratiot has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Gratiot has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Gratiot value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Arenac

Current Value:

County: Arenac

13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Arenac has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Arenac has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Arenac has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Arenac has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Arenac value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level State: Michigan

Current Value:

State: Michigan

13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Michigan has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Michigan has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Michigan value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Tuscola

Current Value:

County: Tuscola

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Tuscola has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tuscola has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Tuscola has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Tuscola has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Tuscola value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Huron

Current Value:

County: Huron

11.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Huron has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Huron has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Huron has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Huron has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Huron value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Midland

Current Value:

County: Midland

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Midland has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Midland has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Midland has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.1%)
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Midland has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
Over time, the Midland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card
Michigan Health Improvement Alliance