Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease State: Michigan
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease State: Michigan
112.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(112.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Arenac
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Arenac
141.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(158.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Bay
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Bay
167.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(169.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Clare
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Clare
111.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(113.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Gladwin
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Gladwin
140.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(142.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Gratiot
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Gratiot
136.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(143.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Huron
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Huron
158.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(147.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Iosco
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Iosco
146.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(165.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Isabella
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Isabella
109.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(100.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Midland
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Midland
79.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(79.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Ogemaw
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Ogemaw
145.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(155.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Roscommon
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Roscommon
117.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(126.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Saginaw
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Saginaw
108.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(101.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Sanilac
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Sanilac
154.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(159.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Tuscola
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Tuscola
145.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(112.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(135.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
