Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Arenac Census Tracts
  • County : Arenac Zip Codes
  • County : Bay Census Tracts
  • County : Bay Zip Codes
  • County : Clare Census Tracts
  • County : Clare Zip Codes
  • County : Gladwin Census Tracts
  • County : Gladwin Zip Codes
  • County : Gratiot Census Tracts
  • County : Gratiot Zip Codes
  • County : Huron Census Tracts
  • County : Huron Zip Codes
  • County : Iosco Census Tracts
  • County : Iosco Zip Codes
  • County : Isabella Census Tracts
  • County : Isabella Zip Codes
  • County : Midland Census Tracts
  • County : Midland Zip Codes
  • County : Ogemaw Census Tracts
  • County : Ogemaw Zip Codes
  • County : Roscommon Census Tracts
  • County : Roscommon Zip Codes
  • County : Saginaw Census Tracts
  • County : Saginaw Zip Codes
  • County : Sanilac Census Tracts
  • County : Sanilac Zip Codes
  • County : Tuscola Census Tracts
  • County : Tuscola Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Region: MiHIA Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
41.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (43.0%), MiHIA has a value of 41.7%.
MI Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), MiHIA has a value of 41.7%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: MiHIA Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
53.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 53.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 53.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.2%), MiHIA has a value of 53.4% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), MiHIA has a value of 53.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, MiHIA (53.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.9%).
Prior Value
(50.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the MiHIA value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Region: MiHIA Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 3.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 3.1% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), MiHIA has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), MiHIA has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Region: MiHIA Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Region: MiHIA Per Capita Income

$32,400
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of $32,400 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,679 while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than $29,736.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of $32,400 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($37,929), MiHIA has a value of $32,400 which is lower and worse.
MI Value
($37,929)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), MiHIA has a value of $32,400 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Region: MiHIA

Value
Compared to:

Region: MiHIA Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), MiHIA has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: MiHIA Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 10.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (8.8%), MiHIA has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), MiHIA has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: MiHIA People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), MiHIA has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: MiHIA People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), MiHIA has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Region: MiHIA Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
26.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, MiHIA has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, MiHIA has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (20.1%), MiHIA has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), MiHIA has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the MiHIA value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Michigan Health Improvement Alliance