Home > Promising Practices > Tobacco Use: Internet-based Cessation Interventions

Tobacco Use: Internet-based Cessation Interventions

CDC

An Evidence-Based Practice

Description

Internet-based tobacco cessation interventions use websites to provide evidence-based information, strategies, and behavioral support to motivate and assist tobacco users interested in quitting. Interventions include one or more of the following:

-Interactive features that help clients monitor progress and provide guidance, feedback, and support
-Tailored guidance that matches users with services and advice
-Coaching, counseling, or social support from peers or trained professionals

Internet content may be developed or adapted to specific populations and communities. Interventions may also incorporate text messaging, telephone calls, or medications.

Results / Accomplishments

The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommends internet-based interventions to increase tobacco use cessation. Evidence shows interventions increase cessation among adults interested in quitting when measured six or more months following intervention.

About this Promising Practice

Primary Contact
The Community Guide
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS V25-5
Atlanta, GA 30329
(404) 498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/
Topics
Health / Tobacco Use
For more details
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/tobacco...

Related Promising Practices

  1. Tobacco Use: Reducing Out-of-Pocket Costs for Evidence-Based Cessation Treatments
  2. Kaiser Permanente Dental Care Program Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Intervention
  3. Tobacco Use: Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs
  4. Tobacco Use: Interventions to Increase the Unit Price for Tobacco Products
  5. Tobacco Use: Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions
  6. Tobacco Use: Quitline Interventions

More

Related Content for: Tobacco Use: Internet-based Cessation Interventions

An Evidence-Based Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, program goals, program implementation steps, and outcomes that have demonstrated program success in achieving the program goal in one or more localities.
  2. The results from an evaluation of the program include quantitative measures showing improvement in the outcome(s) of interest after the implementation of the program (i.e. increase in smoking cessation, not just the delivery of a smoking cessation program). The outcome measure(s) is/are compared at relevant time periods before and after the intervention or program implementation. Alternatively, the evaluation study compares the outcome(s) between an intervention group and an appropriate control group.
  3. The study is of peer-review quality and presents numbers in a scientific manner; measurements of precision and reliability are included (e.g. confidence intervals, standard errors), results from statistical tests show a significant difference or change in the outcome measure(s), and relevant point estimates and p-values are presented. Note: if the results from an evaluation of a program are presented in a scientific manner and the outcome measure is improved compared to the baseline measurement or the control group but the difference is not statistically significant, the practice is classified as effective and not evidence-based.
Michigan Health Improvement Alliance